Education

Education Quality Measurement Assignment

QualityMeasurementAssignment.docx Quality improvement and measurement tools are utilized by a wide range of professionals within a health care organization an

Aug 29, 2025 5 views

Check out this sample solution our expert writers created for a client with a "write assignment" task.

QualityMeasurementAssignment.docx Quality improvement and measurement tools are utilized by a wide range of professionals within a health care organization and may be applied differently depending on the nature of the professional's work. The role of health care professionals can determine how they view quality initiatives, including the different methods of measurement and types of quality improvement tools. Discuss these variations in the applicability of quality improvement and measurement tools with respect to the professional’s area of focus and role within the health care organization. Develop a section of an employee handbook in 1,000–1,250 words, addressing the following: · Summarize the role of three to five different health care professionals and their responsibility in the development and continuation of high-quality health care results. · Identify three quality measurement/improvement tools and discuss the purpose or focus of each. What can these tools be used to understand or assess? · Describe how each of these quality improvement tools could be used to measure and document quality by at least three professionals in a health care organization. Include an example of at least one administrative health professional, one mid-level clinical provider, and a physician. Rubric-QualityMeasurementbyHealthCareProfessionals.pdf 8/26/25, 10:40 AM Page 1 of 5about:srcdoc Quality Measurement by Health Care Professionals - Rubric Summary of the Roles of Di!erent Health Care Professionals and Their Responsibilities 23.75 points Criteria Description Summary of the Roles of Different Health Care Professionals and Their Responsibilities in the Development and Continuation of High-Quality Health Care Results 5. Target 23.75 points Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health care results is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support. 4. Acceptable 20.19 points Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health care results is explained with appropriate details and support. 3. Approaching 17.81 points Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health care results are present, but minimal detail or support is provided. 2. Insufficient 15.44 points Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health care results are partially incorporated, but the information and examples provided are incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Summary of three to five roles of different health care professionals and their responsibilities in the development and continuation of high-quality health care results is not included. Collapse All 8/26/25, 10:40 AM Page 2 of 5about:srcdoc Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement or Improvement Tools Can Be Used 23.75 points Criteria Description Identification and Discussion of What Three Quality Measurement or Improvement Tools Can Be Used to Understand or Assess 5. Target 23.75 points Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support. 4. Acceptable 20.19 points Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are provided with appropriate details and support. 3. Approaching 17.81 points Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are present, but minimal detail or support is provided. 2. Insufficient 15.44 points Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are partially incorporated, but the information and examples provided are incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Identification and discussion of what three quality measurement or improvement tools can be used to understand or assess are not included. 8/26/25, 10:40 AM Page 3 of 5about:srcdoc Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be Used to Measure and Document Quality 28.5 points Criteria Description Description of How Selected Quality Measurement Tools Could be Used to Measure and Document Quality by Three Health Professionals 5. Target 28.5 points A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to measure and document quality by three health professionals is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support. Examples of an administrator, clinician, and physician are included. 4. Acceptable 24.22 points A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to measure and document quality by three health professionals is provided with appropriate details and support. Examples of an administrator, clinician, and physician are included. 3. Approaching 21.38 points A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to measure and document quality by three health professionals is present, but minimal detail or support is provided. Examples of an administrator, clinician, and physician are included. 2. Insufficient 18.53 points A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to measure and document quality by three health professionals is partially incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A description of how the selected quality measurement tools could be used to measure and document quality by three health professionals is not included. 8/26/25, 10:40 AM Page 4 of 5about:srcdoc Mechanics of Writing 9.5 points Criteria Description Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. 5. Target 9.5 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. 4. Acceptable 8.08 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. 3. Approaching 7.13 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. 2. Insufficient 6.18 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. 8/26/25, 10:40 AM Page 5 of 5about:srcdoc Format/Documentation 9.5 points Criteria Description Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline. 5. Target 9.5 points No errors in formatting or documentation are present. 4. Acceptable 8.08 points Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. 3. Approaching 7.13 points Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. 2. Insufficient 6.18 points Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided. Total 95 points © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. https://www.gce.com/ https://www.gce.com/ https://www.gce.com/ https://www.gce.com/ https://www.gce.com/

Need a similar assignment?

Our expert writers can help you with your specific requirements. Get started today.

Order Your Custom Solution

Get a Price Estimate

Price Estimate

Deadline.

Number of Pages.

Price: $12

Order Now

Why Students Choose Us

  • 150+ subject experts with advanced degrees
  • 100% original work with plagiarism reports
  • Secure confidentiality and data protection
  • 24/7 customer support and progress updates
  • Unlimited revisions until you're satisfied