HRAwk1CAP: see attached | Human Resource Management

see attached HRAWEEK1CAP.docx Week 1 HRA CAP Cite two academic/scholarly sources and the Course Text. Textbook: Mello, J.A. (2019). Strategic human resource management (5th ed.). Cengage Learning Inc. ISBN-13: 978-1-337-61999- 1.A. Select a company, possibly the one you want to research this term.    *How might different HR metrics and analytics be best employed for that company? *What workplace trends and challenges will this company need to face from your reading? 1.B.   Identify the three major corporate strategies and how they align with the HR challenges associated with the company you have chosen to research this term.  In the research topic you have chosen, what main barriers do you see that may prevent the company from taking a more strategic approach to HR? Share recommendations to eliminate barriers. 1.C. For the company, identify steps you might take in consulting with the federal government about strategic workforce planning. What factors would you suggest senior managers examine, and what obstacles to implementing change might exist for this company? Also, what are the critical factors to consider in the design of work systems for your chosen company? How does technology play in the design of work systems for this company? 1.D Devise a staffing strategy for the company and submit for peer collaboration. Share, also, how training will be likely change the future of the company? Textbook: Mello, J.A. (2019). Strategic human resource management (5th ed.). Cengage Learning Inc. ISBN-13: 978-1-337-61999- References · Blumberg, M. and Pringle, CD. 1982. The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance.  Academy of Management Review,  7(4): 560–569. · Boudreau, J.W., Hopp, W., McClain, J.O. and Thomas, L.J. 2003. On the Interface Between Operations and Human Resources Management.  Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,  5(3): 179–202. · Boudreau, J.W. and Ramstad, RM. 2006. Talentship and Human Resource Measurement and Analysis: From ROI to Strategic Organizational Change.  Human Resource Planning Journal, 29. · Galbraith, J. 1977.  Organization Design, Addison Wesley Publishing Company. · Lawler, E., Levenson, A., and Boudreau, J. 2004. HR Metrics and Analytics: Use and Impact,  Human Resource Planning Journal, 27(4): 27–35. · Levenson, A. 2005. Harnessing the Power of HR Analytics,  Strategic HR Review,  4(3): 28–31. · Levenson, A. and Faber, T. 2009. Count on Productivity Gains.  HR Magazine, June, 68–74. · Levenson, A., Fenlon, M.J. and Benson, G. 2010. Rethinking Retention Strategies: Work-Life Versus Deferred Compensation in a Total Rewards Strategy.  WorldAtWork Journal, Fourth Quarter, 41–52. · Levenson, A., Lawler, E., and Boudreau, J. 2005. Survey on HR Analytics and HR Transformation: Feedback Report, Center for Effective Organizations, University of Southern California. · Rothwell, W.J., and Sredl, H.J. 1992.  TheASTD Reference Guide to Professional Human Resource Development Roles & Competencies, Second Edition, Volume II, Amherst, MA: HRD Press, Inc. GradDiscussionRubric.pdf TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of Week's Reading No Student Submission (0 points) Does not refer to the readings to support postings (1-13 points) Alludes to the readings to support postings (14-16 points) Refers to examples from the readings to support postings (17-18 points) Provides concrete examples from the readings to support postings; integrates prior readings in postings (19-20 points) Observations No Student Submission (0 points) Does not integrate personal observations or knowledge; does not present new observations (1-13 points) Integrates personal observations and knowledge in a cursory manner; does not present new observations (14-16 points) Integrates personal observations and knowledge in an accurate way; presents new observations (17-18 points) Integrates personal observations and knowledge in an accurate and highly insightful way; presents new observations (19-20 points) Response to Classmates No Student Submission (0 points) Responds in a cursory manner to classmates’ postings (1-13 points) Constructively responds to classmates’ postings (14-16 points) Constructively responds to classmates’ postings; offers insight that encourages other students to think critically about their own work. (17-18 points) Constructively responds to classmates’ postings; masterfully connects the material presented in classmates’ postings to their responses; encourages classmates to think critically about their own work. (19-20 points) Organization, Word Choice, and Sentence Structure No Student Submission (0 points) Posts are disorganized and information is not presented in a logical sequence; word choice and sentence structure are not suitable (1-13 points) Posts are somewhat disorganized, and information is not presented in a logical sequence; word choice and sentence structure are not suitable (14-16 points) Posts are organized, and information is presented in a logical sequence; word choice and sentence structure are suitable; there are a few errors; however, errors do not affect readability. (17-18 points) Posts are organized and information is presented in a logical sequence; word choice and sentence structure are suitable; no errors in the response. (19-20 points) References No Student Submission (0 points) Includes no sources to support conclusions (1-13 points) Includes 1 outside source to support and enrich the discussion; Includes 2 or more outside sources to support and enrich the discussion; sources are properly cited in Includes 2 or more outside sources to support and enrich the discussion; sources are cited using APA format; style guidelines are TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric sources are not properly cited in APA format (14-16 points) APA format and are properly integrated into the discussion response (17-18 points) masterfully integrated into the discussion response. (19-20 points)