Education CLC PPT Assignment

CLCPPTAssignment.docx Create a 6 -slide presentation with detailed speaker notes that addresses the following areas: 1. The chosen area of health care research which is HMIS. 2. The potential ethical issues associated with this area of health care research (the health care research is HMIS. Health Management Information Systems · Include at least three references to support your positions. EthicsintheChangingHealthCareEnvironmentPresentation.pdf 5/8/25, 5:53 PM Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc CLC - Ethics in the Changing Health Care Environment Presentation - Rubric Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points Criteria Description Chosen Area of Health Care Research 5. Excellent 11 points Presentation clearly and thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of health care research. 4. Good 9.35 points Presentation thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of health care research. 3. Satisfactory 8.25 points Presentation identifies and explains a specific area of health care research. 2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points Presentation vaguely identifies and explains a specific area of health care research. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Presentation does not adequately identify or explain a specific area of health care research. Collapse All 5/8/25, 5:53 PM Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points Criteria Description Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research 5. Excellent 11 points Presentation clearly and thoroughly examines potential ethical issues associated with the chosen area of health care research. 4. Good 9.35 points Presentation thoroughly examines potential ethical issues associated with the chosen area of health care research. 3. Satisfactory 8.25 points Presentation examines potential ethical issues associated with the chosen area of health care research. 2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points Presentation vaguely examines potential ethical issues associated with the chosen area of health care research. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Presentation does not adequately examine potential ethical issues associated with the chosen area of health care research. 5/8/25, 5:53 PM Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research 11 points Criteria Description Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research 5. Excellent 11 points Presentation clearly and thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical research and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research. 4. Good 9.35 points Presentation thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical research and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research. 3. Satisfactory 8.25 points Presentation discusses the importance of clinical research and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research. 2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points Presentation vaguely discusses the importance of clinical research and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Presentation does not adequately discuss the importance of clinical research and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research. 5/8/25, 5:53 PM Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care Research 11 points Criteria Description Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care Research 5. Excellent 11 points Presentation clearly and thoroughly explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of current and developing technology in health care research. 4. Good 9.35 points Presentation thoroughly explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of current and developing technology in health care research. 3. Satisfactory 8.25 points Presentation explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of current and developing technology in health care research. 2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points Presentation vaguely explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of current and developing technology in health care research. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Presentation does not adequately explore potential ethical issues surrounding the use of current and developing technology in health care research. 5/8/25, 5:53 PM Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc Presentation of Content 33 points Criteria Description Presentation of Content 5. Excellent 33 points The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. 4. Good 28.05 points The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. 3. Satisfactory 24.75 points The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. 2. Less than Satisfactory 21.45 points The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. 5/8/25, 5:53 PM Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc Layout 11 points Criteria Description Layout 5. Excellent 11 points The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. 4. Good 9.35 points The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. 3. Satisfactory 8.25 points The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. 2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. 5/8/25, 5:53 PM Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 11 points Criteria Description Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 5. Excellent 11 points The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. 4. Good 9.35 points The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. 3. Satisfactory 8.25 points Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. 2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. 5/8/25, 5:53 PM Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.5 points Criteria Description Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5. Excellent 5.5 points Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. 4. Good 4.68 points Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. 3. Satisfactory 4.13 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. 2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. 5/8/25, 5:53 PM Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc Documentation of Sources 5.5 points Criteria Description Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5. Excellent 5.5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 4. Good 4.68 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 3. Satisfactory 4.13 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Sources are not documented. Total 110 points © 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. https://www.gce.com/ https://www.gce.com/ https://www.gce.com/ https://www.gce.com/ https://www.gce.com/ https://www.gce.com/ https://www.gce.com/ https://www.gce.com/ https://www.gce.com/